Summary
Use large context for orientation and mapping, then switch to a much smaller working set for precise execution.
Key points
- Wide context is good for repo mapping, transcript digestion, and architecture orientation.
- Narrow context is better for final code changes, subtle bug diagnosis, and exact reasoning.
- This pattern preserves the value of broad context without paying the full quality penalty during execution.
- Treat 1M context as an exceptional planning/orientation mode, not the default operating posture.
Operational relevance
This should become a default pattern in any serious agentic coding workflow using GPT-5.4 or similar long-context models.
Open questions
- Should the task-card schema include an explicit context tier field?
- Which current workflows cross the threshold where two-pass handling is mandatory?
Sources
wiki/sources/gpt54-1m-context-window-operating-policy.md